Logo eddietorial

YAML vs TOML: Choosing the Right Configuration Language

When it comes to configuration files, two formats stand out: YAML (YAML Ain't Markup Language) and TOML (Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language). Both aim to make configurations human-readable, but they take very different approaches. Understanding their strengths, weaknesses, and best-fit scenarios will help you pick the right one for your project.

YAML (YAML Ain't Markup Language)

Pros

  • Extremely Human-Readable: Minimal syntax using indentation (like Python). Feels natural for lists and nested data.
  • Rich Data Structures: Supports lists, dictionaries (maps), nested objects, multi-line strings, comments, anchors/aliases for reusability, and even custom types.
  • Wide Adoption: Dominant in DevOps (Kubernetes, Ansible, Docker Compose), configuration management, and data serialization.
  • Explicit Typing (Optional): Types can be tagged (e.g., !!int, !!bool) though often inferred.
  • Multi-line Strings: Excellent support for large blocks of text.

Cons

  • Whitespace Sensitivity: Errors in indentation can be subtle and difficult to debug.
  • Complexity: Features like anchors, aliases, and tags add learning overhead.
  • Ambiguity: Unquoted strings and type inference can cause confusion.
  • Security Risks: Executing untrusted YAML can lead to attacks (e.g., “billion laughs”).
  • Verbose for Simple Data: Flat configurations can feel bloated.

TOML (Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language)

Pros

  • Simplicity & Obviousness: Minimal, unambiguous, and INI-like.
  • Explicit Typing: Native support for strings, numbers, booleans, dates/times, arrays, and tables.
  • No Ambiguity: Structure defined by brackets [] and braces {}. No reliance on whitespace.
  • Easy to Parse & Generate: Small, reliable parsers make it efficient.
  • Great for Configuration: Designed specifically for app/tool configs. Popular in Rust (Cargo), Python (pyproject.toml), and Hugo.
  • Safety: Smaller spec reduces attack surface.

Cons

  • Cluttered with Deep Nesting: Inline tables { key = "value" } and [[table]] structures can be visually noisy.
  • Verbose for Lists: Arrays require explicit [].
  • Less Expressive: Lacks YAML features like anchors/aliases, custom types, or multi-document support.
  • Younger Ecosystem: Adoption outside Rust and Python isn’t yet as widespread as YAML.

Ease of Learning & Reading

  • TOML is significantly easier to learn. Its small, consistent syntax maps directly to programming types and avoids surprises. Best suited for flat or moderately nested configs.
  • YAML can look clean for hierarchical structures, but whitespace sensitivity and ambiguity often create problems, especially in collaborative environments.

Long-Term Choice: Which Should You Use?

Choose TOML if:

  • Your primary use case is configuration files.
  • You want simplicity, explicitness, and safety.
  • You need a minimal learning curve with fewer errors.
  • Your data is mostly flat or moderately nested.
  • You work in ecosystems like Rust, Python, or Hugo where TOML is the standard.

Choose YAML if:

  • You need complex, deeply nested data.
  • You want anchors/aliases for reusability or custom types.
  • You require elegant multi-line string handling.
  • You work in YAML-heavy ecosystems (Kubernetes, Ansible, CloudFormation, Docker Compose).
  • Readability for complex maps/lists is more important than simplicity, and you can enforce strict linting.

General Recommendation

For most new projects focused on configuration, TOML is the superior choice. Its simplicity, explicitness, and safety make it more maintainable and less error-prone. Its adoption is steadily growing.

Choose YAML only when:

  • You need its advanced features, or
  • Your ecosystem already mandates it (Kubernetes, Ansible, etc.).

In short: Prefer TOML for configuration simplicity and safety. Use YAML when advanced features or ecosystem lock-in demand it.